poverty, starvation, polarity and 'just is'

"hey I have a question about something you said:

" poverty and starvation is not negative - it is only 'negative' in the mind as an accepted and allowed definition based in fear - where one then creates a 'positive' in the mind and desires to experience 'the positive' --- thus the positive is based in fear"

ok, so if poverty and starvation is not negative (or positive ) as it is only 'negative' in the mind, then I think you would agree that it is valid to say that poverty and starvation just IS.

but then why try to change something which just is (neutral)?

I mean, why try to fix something (IS) which isn't broken? why try to change Being (is)? lol Since starvation and abuse is not "an abnormal state" of being then why do anything about it?

correct me if I am mistaken but, for you to do anything about it, it would be to express a polarized attitude towards it and therefore attribute a meaning (negative) to starvation or abuse? no?"


I stand equal with what is here - I am HERE - all are HERE - when standing as all as one as equal - I see it is myself that is starving, myself that is suffering -- that is unacceptable. Thus I take self responsibility for all as one as equal as myself, to make sure I am not neglecting another as myself, to make sure I am not leaving someone out of my consideration - because in that I am leaving myself out of my consideration within separation. I stand for what is best for all as one as equal as myself - that is to do unto another as you would have them do unto you. That is to give to another what you would give to yourself.

I do not accept suffering to exist - because in that I am accepting suffering to exist within and as me as all as one as equal.

"poverty and starvation just IS"

this is a JustISfication, to not have to face our responsibility for what we accept and allow to go on in our world

give up all your money and place yourself in the position of the starving - see if your words stand then

the circumstance you currently experience is a result of the same system that allows the circumstance of suffering to exist

by saying 'it just is' - is actually a statement of removing something from your consideration. You are thus submitting entirely to the current system and will never question it or take responsibility for anything and will remain only within self interest

 "I mean, why try to fix something (IS) which isn't broken? why try to change Being (is)? lolSince starvation and abuse is not "an abnormal state" of being then why do anything about it? "

tell that to the face of the starving child

 "it would be to express a polarized attitude towards it and therefore attribute a meaning (negative) to starvation or abuse? no?"

no - here you simply show that you have defined action within polarity only within judgments of 'positive' and 'negative' and 'neutral', and are completely directed by / controlled by polarity and do not act one and equal as yourself, here with yourself as starting point / directive principle within making an actual, real consideration about something